In a careful re-evaluation of the works of Lévy-Bruhl, Wiebe establishes the coherence of Lévy-Bruhl's classic distinction between primitive, or mythopoeic, and scientific thought, maintaining that religious thinking is mythopoeic in nature while theology -- which thinks about religion -- is related to modern Western scientific thinking. The pre-Socratic philosophers, Wiebe shows, developed a form of rational thought radically different from the religious-mythopoeic thought that preceded it. Although Plato was concerned with recovery of the pre-philosophic wisdom of ancient Greece, he attempted this within a rational, philosophic structure. Wiebe argues that Christian thought, originally mythopoeic, changed rapidly under the influence of Hellenistic culture, and that the Platonization of Christianity introduced an element of philosophic thinking which would eventually undermine its mythopoeic essence. In clarifying the nature of religious thought and its relation to religion, Wiebe provides a sound basis for the development of a general theory of religion. While of particular interest to philosophers, theologians, and students and scholars of the study of religion, Wiebe's study draws upon sources as diverse as philosophy, history, anthropology, and sociology and will therefore interest anyone involved in these disciplines as well.

Donald Wiebe is a Professor of Divinity at Trinity College and Associate Director of the Graduate Centre for Religious Studies, both at the University of Toronto.

Donald Wiebe's profile page

"a masterful command of the scholarly literature ... will be very helpful. Wiebe argues that theology, rather than being an enterprise supportive of religion, actually undermines religious faith ... a provocative, controversial thesis ... depicts the intellectual revolution inherent in the rise of pre-Socratic philosophy from its intellectual context of mythopoeic thought forms." Thomas V. Morris, Department of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame.
"[Wiebe] comes across as someone who feels that a little provocation can be a useful thing ... [He] draws on material from anthropology, classical studies, theology, and philosophy; he shows interesting connections between subjects traditionally considered only separately and by scholars working in a highly specialized field." Jay Newman, Department of Philosophy, University of Guelph.

"a masterful command of the scholarly literature ... will be very helpful. Wiebe argues that theology, rather than being an enterprise supportive of religion, actually undermines religious faith ... a provocative, controversial thesis ... depicts the intellectual revolution inherent in the rise of pre-Socratic philosophy from its intellectual context of mythopoeic thought forms." Thomas V. Morris, Department of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame. "[Wiebe] comes across as someone who feels that a little provocation can be a useful thing ... [He] draws on material from anthropology, classical studies, theology, and philosophy; he shows interesting connections between subjects traditionally considered only separately and by scholars working in a highly specialized field." Jay Newman, Department of Philosophy, University of Guelph.