Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to search

Law Legal History

Hunger, Horses, and Government Men

Criminal Law on the Aboriginal Plains, 1870-1905

by (author) Shelley A.M. Gavigan

Publisher
UBC Press
Initial publish date
Oct 2012
Category
Legal History, Native American, Post-Confederation (1867-), Prairie Provinces (AB, MB, SK)
  • Hardback

    ISBN
    9780774822527
    Publish Date
    Oct 2012
    List Price
    $95.00
  • Paperback / softback

    ISBN
    9780774822534
    Publish Date
    Jul 2013
    List Price
    $34.95
  • eBook

    ISBN
    9780774822541
    Publish Date
    Oct 2012
    List Price
    $125.00

Classroom Resources

Where to buy it

Description

Scholars often accept without question that the Indian Act (1876) criminalized First Nations. Drawing on court files, police and penitentiary records, and newspaper accounts from the Saskatchewan region of the North-West Territories between 1870 and 1905, Shelley Gavigan argues that the notion of criminalization captures neither the complexities of Aboriginal participation in the criminal courts nor the significance of the Indian Act as a form of law. This illuminating book paints a vivid portrait of Aboriginal defendants, witnesses, and informants whose encounters with the criminal law and the Indian Act included both the mediation and the enforcement of relations of inequality.

About the author

Awards

  • Short-listed, The Sir John A. Macdonald Prize, Canadian Historical Association
  • Short-listed, CLSA Book Prize, Canadian Law and Society Association
  • Winner, Clio Prize for the Prairies, Canadian Historical Association

Contributor Notes

Shelley A.M. Gavigan is a professor of law at Osgoode Hall Law School and a member of the graduate faculties in Law, Socio-Legal Studies, and Women’s Studies at York University.

Editorial Reviews

An enormously interesting and comprehensive read that does a great deal to provide the legal treatise with the respect that it should be afforded. It is an important book for anybody interested not only in legal history but also its “kissing cousins” such as social and political history. Legal history of this sort is something that has, unfortunately, received short shrift, so it is heartening to find such a well-written and well-edited riposte to those who might feel that the legal treatise is not worthy of the scrutiny of some of the best legal minds out there.

Canadian Law Library Review, Vol. 38, No. 2 2013