Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to search

Political Science Human Rights

Genocides by the Oppressed

Subaltern Genocide in Theory and Practice

edited by Nicholas A. Robins & Adam Jones

Publisher
Indiana University Press
Initial publish date
May 2009
Category
Human Rights, Discrimination & Race Relations, Cultural
  • Paperback / softback

    ISBN
    9780253220776
    Publish Date
    May 2009
    List Price
    $33.00

Classroom Resources

Where to buy it

Description

In the last two decades, the field of comparative genocide studies has produced an increasingly rich literature on the targeting of various groups for extermination and other atrocities, throughout history and around the contemporary world. However, the phenomenon of "genocides by the oppressed," that is, retributive genocidal actions carried out by subaltern actors, has received almost no attention. The prominence in such genocides of non-state actors, combined with the perceived moral ambiguities of retributive genocide that arise in analyzing genocidal acts "from below," have so far eluded serious investigation. Genocides by the Oppressed addresses this oversight, opening the subject of subaltern genocide for exploration by scholars of genocide, ethnic conflict, and human rights. Focusing on case studies of such genocide, the contributors explore its sociological, anthropological, psychological, symbolic, and normative dimensions.

About the authors

Nicholas A. Robins' profile page

Adam Jones is a political scientist, writer, and photojournalist based at the University of British Columbia Okanagan in Kelowna, BC, Canada. He is the author of Genocide: A Comprehensive Introduction and numerous other books in genocide studies. He is executive director of Gendercide Watch.

Adam Jones' profile page

Editorial Reviews

[This] book offers connections between mass killing based on ethnicity and mass killing based on religion or politics, and between mass killing and the usually smaller killing of riots, massacres, and hate crimes. Although the book is framed as a challenge to genocide theory, perhaps its greater challenge is to any account of intergroup conflict that does not attend to intergroup emotions.March 2010

Contemporary Sociology