Many have criticized liberalism for being too individualist, but few have offered an alternative that goes beyond a vague affirmation of the need for community. In this entertaining book, written in dialogue form, Daniel Bell fills this gap, presenting and defending a distinctively communitarian theory against the objections of a liberal critic. In a Paris café Anne, a strong supporter of communitarian ideals, and Philip, her querulous critic, debate the issues. Drawing on the works of such thinkers as Charles Taylor, Michael Sandel, and Alasdair MacIntyre, Anne attacks liberalism's individualistic view of the person by pointing to our social embeddedness. She develops Michael Walzer's idea that political thinking involves the interpretation of shared meanings emerging from the political life of a community, and rebuts Philip's criticism that this approach damages her case by being conservative and relativistic. She goes on to develop a justification of communal life and to answer the criticism that communitarians lack an alternative moral vision. The book ends with two later discussions, by Will Kymlicka and Daniel Bell, in which Anne and another friend, Louise, criticize the book's earlier debate and put it in perspective.

Daniel Bell's profile page

Will Kymlicka is the Canada Research Chair in Political Philosophy at Queen’s University. He is the author of seven books published by Oxford University Press, most recently Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights (2011), co-authored with Sue Donaldson. His previous books include Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights (1995) and Multicultural Odysseys: Navigating the New International Politics of Diversity (2007). In 2013, he delivered the HLA Hart Memorial Lecture at the University of Oxford on Animals and the Frontiers of Citizenship.

Will Kymlicka's profile page

'This book gives an excellent account of thie body of work. A clear and very readable, indeed enjoyable, piece of writing. The dialogue form is used skilfully to bring the communitarian position to life and to give an overview of the debate between it and liberalism which is central to current social philosophy ... A great virtue of this book is that one need not agree with all the ideas it advocates in order to welcome it as an engaging and stimulating discussion of these issues.' Times Higher Education Supplement

'entertaining, stimulating, and unusual in attempting to develop and render plausible non-trivial communitarian ideas rather than dismissing them out of hand' Political Studies

'for those who are unfamiliar with the so-called liberal-communitarian debate, this book offers an accessible account without sacrificing the more scholarly discussion ... Daniel Bell's book will help readers, specialists and non-specialists alike, gain a clearer insight into these difficult questions' Canadian Journal of Political Science

'The author deserves to be commended for his originality and his courage in opting for this format and anyone who wishes to learn more about communitarianism really ought to look at this book and judge for themselves whether its approach suits them.' Talking Politics

'A spirited and absorbing book, animated by a sharp sensitivity to political events in the real world as much as by a firm grasp of recent theorizing ... The novelty of the book's dialogic form only reinforces the vigour and freshness with which Bell engages the issues that separate communitarians and liberals.' Times Literary Supplement

'excellent book ... a book that will be accessible to a wide range of readers' Radical Philosophy

'for those who are unfamiliar with the so-called liberal-communitarian debate, this book offers an accessible account without sacrificing the more scholarly discussion ... Daniel Bell's book will help readers, specialists and non-specialists alike, gain a clearer insight into these difficult questions. Some may even be pleased to see that the dialogue form in philosophy has not died out.' Canadian Journal of Political Science

'This is a timely book...Bell's philosophical dialogue is, in fact, witty and irreverential. The book reminds us of the rich heuristic potential of this much-neglected form...it offers the liveliest and most accessible introduction to the intensely important debate between liberals and communitarians that has yet appeared. For that reason alone - and quite apart from its persuasive advocacy of the communitarian cause - his book is very welcome: it will engage anyone torn between the rival claims of community and personal freedom in modern life, which, of course, is all of us' The Guardian